Stoicism philosophy reddit. I consider myself to be a buddhist and a stoic now.

Stoicism philosophy reddit Related to both of these issues is the worry that Stoicism deals poorly and unrealistically with the problem of tragedy and moral luck. Stoicism: A Very Short Introduction by Brad Inwood is another broad overview by an academic scholar of Stoicism, but it's much more condensed. In addition, stoicism allows me to get shit done no matter what I am going through. Buddhism to me seems more about escaping the world, while stoicism advocates embracing the world and improving yourself. Seneca's writings are the most beautiful and easy-to-read. I consider myself to be a buddhist and a stoic now. For me, success comes from: I only possess cosmetic knowledge of this philosophy, and have barely even read Letters from a Stoic by Seneca (Just two of the letters, as I remember). So to be the antithesis of cold, or stoic is feared within themselves. I really liked “A Guid to the Good Life: the Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. I've been listening to meditations by Marcus Aurelius and am trying to learn about stoic philosophy. You can read about stoicism as a philosophy directly from the sources for free. I'm reading about the sophists and hedonists now, but hopefully I can resume stoic literature First, a non-Stoic disclaimer: depression can manifest in many ways, not just sadness. Cleomedes Astronomy is one of the only complete Stoic texts that survived but because its focus is physics and the heavens its largely ignored. These are just a few that are coming to mind, as illustrative of issues people have often picked out. The stoic position on suicide is that it should be dignified, as all our actions should be, and it should not be out of fear, or weakness, but from strength, plenty of thought, and based on the judgement whether you can live your life with dignity or not. It always creates the world in its own image; it cannot do otherwise; philosophy is this tyrannical impulse itself, the most spiritual Will to Power, the will to "creation of the You might be interested in reading Cicero's On Ends (or at least the parts about Stoicism). Marcus Aurelius, one of the most quoted and beloved stoic thinkers would most likely not fit the mold of how we think of stoics today. Conversely, the only thing that necessitates misery and is “bad” or “evil” is the corruption of reason, namely vice. Irvine. Stoicism: A Very Short Introduction by Brad Inwood How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life by Massimo Pigliucci Stoicism: A Very Short Introduction" by John Sellars Stoic Serenity: A Practical Course on Finding Inner Peace by Keith Seddon The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday A Guide to the Good Life by William B. Prominent Stoics ~2000 years ago advocated for women to be educated and practice philosophy, well ahead of their peers in other philosophical schools. I think that is clearly contrary to the philosophy itself, but it's possible some could reasonably be wary of the philosophy if it's producing toxic people like that. ” Pretty readable. ME is one of the best in Spanish, it is based on several philosophical currents and deals with universal principles, values and know their difference, stoicism is one of the most named or is what I like to believe ^^ Pedro Vivar is the author of the podcast and three related books, the first one is called - Stoic Echoes - I think it will be good if you listen to it, he is all example Even hardline atheists in philosophy of religion treat the subject with a lot of respect. The physics is obviously obsolete and I know nothing of the logic. Stoicism, along with any other philosophy, can easily turn shallow and into "Improve your life in 5 simple steps!" once absorbed by mainstream media, so I would encourage you to not do too much googling or using much apps until you do your own delving into actual Stoic texts, and then derive from them what Stoicism means to you. That’s really my only main gripe with stoicism as a philosophy and even then that approach is (like I mentioned earlier) a double bladed sword. I used to subscribe to Buddhist beliefs, but as I read more about stoicism I realized they have many fundamental differences. s did which killed 50-150 thousand people almost all civilians. Stoicism is about the development of practical wisdom, which each individual must then apply to their particular circumstances. in short, while I believe Stoicism is a very powerful tool, framework, to approach life, it doesnt answer the bigger why, and that is where I diverge from the ancient stoics and turn towards the God of my ancient forefathers for guidance. Try stoicism! You going through chemo? Try Stoicism! Lost your job? Lost your kids to the ex- and the courts? Things spiralling out of control? Try Stoicisim! I'm not saying stoicism as a philosophy of slavery is a bad thing. EMOTION. For a twist there is Chaeremon of Alexandria who was an egyptian priest and Stoic philosopher who applied Stoic philosophy to the egyptian pantheon. Saddler. I am already seeing so many different facets to Stoicism rear their head in the comment section. ADHD objectively exists, and is by far the most treatable mental disorder with medication. Our philosophy was founded in Athens, Greece, about 2300 years ago by a man named Zeno. "What is Stoicism" by John Sellars is a brief, simple overview of Stoic philosophy (also available as a lecture) The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy has many good entries related to Stoicism. A path that lasts a lifetime. " The Greek Stoics were possible the best metaphysicians, logicians, and epistemologists of Hellenistic Greece, but hardly ever will you hear about withholding assent, cognitive impressions, primary and secondary causes, the study of physics, the composition of logical arguments, etc. One can be a Buddhist Christian, why not a stoic? What you put your faith in does not matter. I don't think this is a seriously fatal criticism of Stoicism, but a committed Stoic should at least have a way of responding to it. But although I did read quite some stoic works by now, my favorite being Seneca, the Buddhist philosophers of the Nalanda tradition, like Nagarjuna or Aryadeva or Shantideva, went oh so much deeper and were a lot more analytical than anything I found by the stoics yet. Irvine How to Be a Stoic by Massimo Pigliucci Letters from a Stoic by Lucius Annaeus Seneca Stoicism and the Art of Happiness by Donald Robertson The Obstacle Is the Way by Ryan Holiday Stoicism by John Sellars Discourses and Selected Writings by Epictetus For me (and perhaps you), Stoic philosophy is not the same thing. Negative emotion is a normal part of being human. If a person "follows Stoicism as a religion" they're not following it at all - Stoic philosophy is a series of arguments for reality that you evaluate against reality. Stoicism is focused on reason, using reason to address emotions, life events, character development. It's not a philosophey per se, but it is based on Stoicism and is a major school of psychotherapy. That vastly depends on the branch of Stoicism you decide to follow. I'm enjoying the book but ancient Romans wrote in such a sophisticated way that by the time my brain fully comprehends one sentence the narrator is already finishing the next. Still reading up on these things though. It depends if you want to dive straight into the 'source' texts, or whether you want to read a modern interpretation. Lol his stoic christian philosophy of warmongering? John McCain was a war criminal I mean that definitely might make him a good christian but thats as far from a stoic as possible. it truly opened We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. For example Einzelgänger talk about virtue in almost every stoic video. Though, atheism and Stoicism are certainly compatible. Albert Ellis, the founder of REBT, considers Psychotherapy to be "Applied Philosophy". I think Russell would probably say that here he's writing a history of philosophy and so giving himself a bit of leeway to engage in passing ad hominem I think the arguments against Stoicism either misunderstand the philosophy or are just plain poor. I also like “The Practicing Stoic,” but I felt this book is better if you’ve read some other stoic stuff first. I will try to summarise it. Enjoy! Stoic philosophy includes Stoic physics, logic, and ethics. Of course the above is a dramatic simplification of stoicism that leaves out a lot of important pieces that shape what stoicism really is (hard determinism, acting according to nature, and handling indifferents properly, for starters), but those are certainly the most accessible pieces of the philosophy because they really form a behavioral Stoicism by John Sellars is an introductory-level academic overview of Stoic philosophy and is a solid introduction to the subject. And for good reason. If you haven't already, I'd encourage you to hop over to the FAQ and look for some good intro sources to the philosophy. A major part of stoic philosophy emphasizes keeping yourself away from people's opinions. The ethics - the rules for living a good life - are pretty robust, IMO. Given the centrality of cosmopolis, civic engagement, and so on in Stoic practice, more Stoic-oriented organizations (501c, perhaps) which involve themselves in civic affairs, charities, and the like would (I suspect) greatly extend the reach of Stoic practice. We care about things, but we do not cling to them as if they were necessary for a good life. A. " Jules Evans, Philosophy for Life: And Other Dangerous Situations. Feelings of emptiness can be a symptom, and if you feel this is abnormal for you, I'd recommend counseling before applying Stoic disciplines (maybe CBT or REBT, so it's at least consistent with stoic techniques). This is the perfect time to join if you're new to stoicism or philosophy and looking for a supportive community to explore big questions together. Escaping rebirth is the main goal and it can take many life times to do it. I am new to school of philosophy. REBT (Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy) is openly derived from Stoicism. It takes a historicist approach, putting the Stoics in their ancient Roman context, looking at the lives of Seneca and Marcus Aurelius. No language, no philosophy. If you mean the concept of "the self" in philosophical terms, there's disagreement even in academic circles as to what extent the ancient Stoics understood a "self". Meditations : A New Translation (Modern Library Classics) by Marcus Aurelius / Gregory Hays Stoics love to describe their philosophy as being all about virtue, but I think it is anything but virtuous. amor fati, loving my fate, made me love all my experiences, both good and bad instead of just enduring it. Very informative, however. What that means is that it's a philosophy about how to live life and live it well. Where the Stoic endures pain, the Dolorist pursues it. Stoicism is a wisdom philosophy. Where the Hedonist desires pleasure and comfort, the Dolorist desires struggle and discomfort. In Book 3, he presents the Stoic position through the character of Cato the Younger (and I think it's one of the best summaries of the Stoic position in classical literature). It's a philosophy that challenges us to live with virtue, to embrace adversity, to seek wisdom, and to find meaning in every moment. For instance, the Stoics defend a substantive account of human nature which establishes the conditions of the good life and defend a conception of natural law as indicating to us the good use of things in our lives, whereas if by existentialism you mean a position like Sartre's assertion that existence precedes essence, such Are there credible criticisms against Stoicism? Sure. Enjoy! A good example of someone who uses stoicism everyday would be general Mattis (current USA Sec of Defense for non American redditors). “Stoicism has never worked and is useless as a philosophy. Then in Book 4, he raises his objections against Stoicism. You said that stoicism and christianity differ in that stoicism says to rely on yourself for whatever you can do and have thur ready to the universe, but replace the word universe with God, and there's no difference. He's also the most relatable of the Stoics, IMO, perhaps because he was less of a sage than Aurelius and Epictetus were. It seems likely that they advance inconsistent propositions. Most of my earlier objections turned out to be caused by my own misunderstanding. In reality, the highest good for the Stoic is the Self, and Stoicism is all about building an impregnable wall so the Self is safeguarded, enshrined, and untouchable. It’s a philosophy you can see echoed (although sometimes Just as an offer Stoic refers to a practitioner of the philosophy, stoic is a person who response unfeelingly, these two things are quite different. Anyone can grasp the main principles of stoicism, so it’s approachable, while living according to the principles is really hard and takes practise. But in stoicism this is the final goal, whereas in buddhism its just a high virtue. Stoicism does not encourage indifference. Mar 21, 2023 · It takes a historicist approach, putting the Stoics in their ancient Roman context, looking at the lives of Seneca and Marcus Aurelius. Hello, I’ve stumbled upon Stoicism recently and after days of researching for the best beginner books for Stoicism on Reddit, YouTube, etc. After studying with the Cynics for several years, he studied at Plato's Academy, then started his own school at the central market in Athens. In Stoicism you are thriving to be Virtuous (Courage, Justice, Wisdom and Self Control). Please: Review the subreddit rules. Massimo Pigliucci, How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. Different end goals but a lot of overlap between the two. Many times these emotions are for our physical benefit to ward us from danger or motivate us to action. So, If you're calling Stoic philosophy dull, he would be okay with it. i was taking existentialism in college at the time, and the readings really opened my eyes. Long refers to Lipsius’ works as "a disaster for the interpretation of Stoicism as systematic philosophy" and that "the modern world’s general image of Stoicism owes a great deal to Lipsius’ narrow focus on the uncomplaining endurance of one’s fate. This fits really well with the action oriented nature of Stoicism. The title was something like "Dolorism: A Philosophy for Men". Stoicism also has a little bit in common with taoism in that both kind of talk about the world pushing you in a certain way and how you should follow this path it set out rather than struggling against it. The other main tenet of Stoicism, which is less unattractive but still very contentious, is their radical opinion on how agency and well-being relate. Dolorism is the opposite of Hedonism. It's not going to be easy or simple. You can find the ancient sources (Epictetus, Seneca, Musonius Rufus, Cicero, and Marcus Aurelius’) relevant works in the Reddit library (Click Menu on r/Stoicism) for free. Let’s learn to endure life’s challenges by applying principles presented in Stoicism. The current “broicist” take on Stoicism is very male-centred, but it’s not actual Stoicism. r/Stoicism: We are a community committed to learning about and applying philosophical Stoic principles and techniques. In Stoicism, I notice less of a tendency toward early Stoicism's adherence to pantheism and predetermination. Whilst some of you, I'm sure, will believe that Ryan Holiday has capitalised off of Stoic philosophy and maybe morally disagree, I'm grateful he has brought such ancient and wise teachings to the masses. When you look at school shooters, abusers, etc. It sounds great in theory but never works because it makes you apathetic and passionless and justifies toxic masculinity and global suffering. they are people who do not have control over their emotions. But this is an old and everlasting story: what happened in old times with the Stoics still happens today, as soon as ever a philosophy begins to believe in itself. Stoicism is a philosophy that provides a framework to achieve moral excellence and a smooth flow of life in accordance with Nature. The stoic mindset summed up briefly by author Marcus Epictetus (taken from his book "The Stoic Way of Life") "The philosophy of developing a logical and peaceful approach to ones life experiences and exposure concentrating on what lies in your control and putting aside what does not. I think one major factor is that stoicism is a practical philosophy that is, like many popular things, easy to learn but hard to master. Take what applies to you and make it work for your lifestyle. For YouTube specifically, Gregory B. Good book about the craziness of life and philosophy and psychology, not about stoicism but can be viewed through a stoic lens. And although there’s times where I feel like I don’t always reflect the principles in my everyday life, Like sometimes I get worked up on things I can’t necessarily control and all. Someone once said that what makes us better makes us stronger. I appreciate Epictetus' writings though, and I find his philosophy more in-depth. I have sort of combined my own ideals with that of whatever I could grasp from the resources on Stoicism to act in a certain way whenever I am going through an emotional outburst. Keith Seddon, Stoic Serenity: A Practical Course on Finding Inner Peace. Stoicism is completely against letting the world descend into the pits. I hate the quotes and always feel philosophy is something of an influence rather than making your own decisions. It unpacks the core philosophical standpoints and chats about their modern applications. A nice introductory overview covering the development of the school and the three parts (Logic, Physics, Ethics) of Stoicism: John Sellars, (2006) Stoicism (Ancient Philosophies) For something more advanced: Brad Inwood (ed. There is nothing gender-specific about it. I fall into the category of a Moral Nihilistic form of Practical Stoicism (labelling for ease). The r/Stoicism subreddit is a forum for discussion of Stoicism, the school of philosophy founded by Zeno of Citium in the 3rd century BC. I’m currently watching a series of lectures he’s posted ‘Stoic Philosophy and Practice: The Basics’ start with session 1, it’s a summary of the cardinal virtues. I'm in my mid-30s now and started reading about stoic philosophy on a whim. He personally defended the carpet bombing of camodia the u. This is a counterintuitive gloss of what "good" means -- in ordinary language, winning the lottery is good for The Stoics did think that benefiting from philosophy required dedication to philosophy, but they did not think that attaining or deserving the label "Stoic" was important. I feel that it goes well with stoicism. Stoics accept emotions are part of life, and practice how to process them in healthy ways such that we aren't disoriented by them to the point they distract us from being virtuous. Those arguments make specific, testament claims about what parts of the human mind exist and what the consequence of using them in a particular way is. This is commonly misunderstood because we describe things external to our moral character as "indifferent" to ourselves, but really Stoics have preferences or dispreferences about a lot of externals. I started with How To Be A Stoic by Massimo Pigliucci and found it an excellent, broad introduction to modern Stoicism. No suggestions that one race is inferior to another, nor that women are less rational than men, nor that trans people cannot determine their own gender identity. Its like the same symptoms of stoicism, but from a different set of principals/problems. I’ve found that these 4 books are recommended the most (and are also available in my country). Here we see the idea at the root of the philosophy of Epictetus specifically, and which AA Long argues might have been unique to his Stoic school: the idea of "preconceptions", which you might sometimes see translated to "precognitions". That's how far modern philosophy is from Stoicism and a bunch of other such "philosophies" as ways of life. It's honestly more of a reason why Stoicism is good. Edit: Buddhism without accepting rebirth isn't Buddhism. ), (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Stay strong. Any philosophy of life that has the aim of eliminating negative emotions such as anger, fear, and frustration is going to be fruitless. This formula can be engaging for people. To follow philosophy, be it Stoicism, Epicureanism, Aristotelianism, or Eastern philosophy and religion, be it Sufism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, is a great good. Produces a number of excellent videos on philosophy, not exclusively on Stoicism. I think the confusion with Stoicism is rooted in misunderstanding the concept of acceptance. Epicurean philosophy might give the individual a peace of mind but the world will be worse off for it. Then it gives you practical advice that fits with stoic philosophy. all of which the Greek Stoics considered vital for living a r/Stoicism subreddit introduction, rules, and resource guide. He’s got a lot of Stoic content, he does philosophy in general, but he’s very partial to the Stoics. The role of the r/Stoicism community is to foster a greater understanding of Stoic principles and techniques within ourselves and our fellow prokoptôn. Agree with his politics or not, he is extremely well read on stoicism and stoic philosophers (and philosophy/ethics in general) and uses it to help him make a lot of tough decisions where loss of life is guaranteed no matter what decision you make. It is true that Stoicism is generally compatible with being a wealthy individual since wealth is just a preferred indifferent, and that can make people uncomfortable. r/Stoicism: We are a community committed to learning about and applying philosophical Stoic principles and techniques. Gives you a little background on who the stoics were. So even though stoicism and daoism are superficially very similar, they actually turn out to be almost opposites in a way; Stoicism advocates for a kind of rigid self-disciplinary detachment, while Daoism advocates for a kind of free, embodied engagement in which the "detachment" is a letting go of the instrumental thinking which stoicism would Further, Marcus Aurelius, one of the most renowned stoics, spent his time ensuring that the Roman Empire was well-governed, so that his people would enjoy benefits which are considered worthless by Stoic philosophy. Our own state of mind, our actions, the actions of others and how we react to them, etc. 'Dolor' is Latin for pain. A big part of stoicism is that the wise man has a duty to his community to go into politics and take on the duties and responsibilities of the state. Kierkegaard alone, in his philosophical fragments, explains very well how philosophy on its own can't offer the type of things that a philosophy tempered with religion offers. I also practice Zen and visit a Zen temple regularly, though I keep my Stoicism and Zen separate. Both in volume I and in volume II, we are treated to a fair summary of the entire philosophical movement of Stoicism with plenty of (untranslated Latin and Greek) quotes from Marcus Aurelius, Seneca, Epictetus, and other notable Stoics. There are also classical criticisms especially from Epicureans and Skeptics that challenge the perceived extravagances of Stoic religious The Stoic does this by using reason to become more disciplined, and by using discipline to practice using reason. Because after receiving so much trauma, theres often an argument within a person of that if they didnt have their morals or empathy at that level, it wouldnt have happened. Read the primary sources themselves (so actually sit down with books by Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus, Musonius, and Cicero) and then watch and read the works of actual scholars, not popularizers (so people like Anthony Long, Pierre Hadot, Christopher Gill, Susanne Bobzien, Margaret Graver, John Sellars, and many others). While exegetical analyses are in abundance, there are in fact very few works of practical Stoic philosophy. Imo that's bullshit. Do I need to first explore philosophical concepts such as ‘metaphysics', ‘nature’ and all that before I can truly understand the words of Epictetus and Marcus? My first philosophy book I have ever read was meditations. This focus is lacking everywhere in recent moral theory; even its resident ally, virtue ethics, is dangerously undercommited to praxis. Nov 20, 2021 · It depends if you want to dive straight into the 'source' texts, or whether you want to read a modern interpretation. The largest difference in my non-expert-in-either view is the practices. Stoicism is a living philosophy, and as such it changes with the authors who document and proclaim its value and those who serve to exemplify it in the act of their living. He voted to repeal glas steagal. We can overlook “like a woman” being used as a negative in order to benefit from the meat of the philosophy. However I have no real understanding of philosophy in general and feel as though some of the OG stoic material is lost of me because of this. On the Stoic view the only things that are good for me are the good choices I make. The dichotomy between what you can control and what you can't is a commonly-understood element of Stoicism. Stoic philosophy as such often doesn't have a direct solution to their specific problem, simply because that's not how it works at all. What kind of stoicism are we talking 1) stoicism as a philosophy?, 2) stoicism in the vernacular sense, 3) stoicism as it is grifted to men? 1. I’m currently reading ‘The Daily Stoic’. Heirocles Ethics is fragments of an ethical textbook. It's hard not to when so many religious thinkers have had such profound insights. I know that Stoicism isn’t a religion (a religion has set of unquestionable beliefs) , but a broader and much more open minded philosophy (as Seneca said ‘Zeno is our dearest friend, but the truth is even dearer’) . Epictetus is probably the closest we have to a Stoic sage. I hope you're all well, wherever you are. Recall that Stoicism, in ancient times at least, believed that the universe is divine and rationality ordered, and everything happens for a reason. T No matter what philosophy you try to follow, it's going to be difficult to follow it over 50% of the time. It quickly becomes very dense, they often wax poetic, and they are not structured in a way conducive to learning about Stoicism as a philosophy. A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy by William B. I am interested in both your opinions and what Stoicism says about these particular problems. *Every thing that is unverifiable is also untestable. Philosophy time. There is no Stoic view on ADHD anymore than there is a Stoic view on gravity or Twitter. We can and should aim for achievement, progress and purpose. This community is built to elevate the human spirit, provide life inspiration, and help people find purpose. The above should indicate some reasons why Stoicism as a way of life is absent in contemporary ethics. So if someone says Stoicism isn't working for them, it's not because they haven't found a Cato-like mentor, it's because they haven't learned the fundamentals of philosophy, and this doesn't provide any insight. I feel like it’s made a big change. Without unverifiable dogmatic assertions, nothing can be asserted. I first learned it by accidentally clicking it on my yt feed. I don't pretend to be an expert on stoicism or any other ancient philosophy, but, while I think stoicism can have a valuable place in minor parts of my life, I think I'm more of a [classical] hedonist at heart. On any particular topic of Stoic philosophy there are oodles more criticisms, of course. Stoicism was a philosophy developed 2000 years ago, long before modern psychology. It then takes a look at what Nietzsche and Hegel said about the Stoics. Reply reply Maleficent_Idea_9197 In other words, you are IT! From the Hindu philosophy of Vedanta, the eponymous Tao in Taoist philosophy, the Stoic philosophy of the Logos, and the Enlightenment philosophy of Spinoza and others, Pantheism has an ancient and rich history, though it has never attained the widespread reach of conventional religions. It's The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness The Daily Stoic: 366 Meditations on Wisdom, Perseverance, and the Art of Living How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Lives of the Stoics: The Art of Living from Zeno to Marcus Aurelius Stoicism is not a religion. Except for tautologies, the truth of *any assertion is its alignment with another assertion deemed true. Unlike Skepticism, Stoicism is a dogmatic philosophy. For example, Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations can be found here. For me it was at least great practice of English listening :D. The contemporary stoic position on suicide would look something like this: The Stoics maintained, quite controversially among ancient ethical thought, that the only thing that always contributes to happiness, as its necessary and sufficient condition, is virtue. There’s nothing in real Stoicism that excludes women, aside from the same casual misogyny that is seen in pretty much all ancient works. r/Stoicism is the fucking worst we all know it, but then you get people who now believe r/Stoicism actually reflects stoicism. Im just noting this for reference Reply reply r/Stoicism: We are a community committed to learning about and applying philosophical Stoic principles and techniques. Even in the ancient world, stoicism was taught to women who they knew were as capable of following stoicism as men. With this in mind, Stoicism is not a quick fix or a passing trend; it's a lifetime journey of self-discovery, self-improvement, and wisdom. There are always things we need to deal with in life. The organized Stoic community is a MeetUp group which meets on an infrequent basis. Right, Stoic theology is not only a central part of their philosophy -- and this alone suffices to show the contradictions between Stoicism and atheism -- moreover, Stoic theology is the basis for prominent aspects of Stoic ethical practice and understanding of human nature, which rely on Stoic theology for their sense, so that the atheist must Stoicism mentions dealing with the struggle but not lingering with it although you can see bits of lingering with that here and there in many of their writings. This is a bit different, because its still same philosophy that could be studied more deeper through books. Providing context and elaboration as to a topic’s relevance to the philosophy of Stoicism gives us all a common frame of reference for engagement. There is a classical debate about whether it errs by denying the emotions a place in ethics and the cultivation of humanity, although there is some ambiguity here resulting from terminological issues. So, I guess a stoic wouldn't care if someone argues with him about his way of living. This isn't a quick fix because, like Alfred-Adler points out, you're unlearning a lifetime of habits and figuring out alternative ones. The one glaring flaw, when advocating theism, Stoic philosophers frequently invoked an argument from ignorance, which is fallacious thinking. You read the philosophy. Stoicism does not believe in rebirth a lot of them question an Sure. It is similar to Stoicism and yet distinct. Familiarize yourself with the basics of Stoicism. Margaret Graver, Stoicism and Emotion. Before that I never checked any philosophy. Stoic Philosophy is a way of living and it has to be embodied in yourself. Stoicism is the way. These things help contribute to good and happy lives. Nancy Sherman, Stoic Warriors: The Ancient Philosophy behind the Military Mind First of all, Stoicism is a philosophy. It's not that it's lesser, it's just not applicable. Here is the list of things Epictetus calls a "preconception": Good and bad Right and wrong In my mind, stoicism must evolve and change with the times to remain relevant. With Stoicism you are trying to change a mindset that was most likely set in childhood and generally goes against the rest of society. I find that there's more Stoicism in the Bushido or The Art of War or Native American cultures or War and Peace and even Battlestar Galactica than in most of scholarly philosophy. UPDATE: One thing I forgot to mention, that's critical, is that stoicism is a philosophy of Stoicism is a great philosophy for anyone seeking to empower themselves, but a stoic who's interested in getting closer to the truth should read beyond good and evil and see if they're still so certain of their convictions afterwards. I am still learning, so I'm very interested in reading your thoughts on this. We re total beginners in philosophy so there's no need for any previous knoweldge in the subject, the book club is starting from the basics and it's only a couple of months old. I really don't even know the term "stoicism" 1 month back. However, there is also a hidden element that makes this a trichotomy: what you can't control now, but could in the future (if you worked on it). Hi everyone, I wanted to share some thoughts on the similarities between Miyamoto Musashi's philosophy and Stoicism. Maybe I don't know enough, but Taoism seems more similar to me than Stoicism, mainly because Stoicism is so optimistic in world view, and Buddhism is considered more pessimistic than Taoism. Also, something i noticed in a stoic club back in my bachelor years is that some people think it is wrong to do things just for enjoyment purpose. These things produce effective and contributing members of society. Stoicism is a big deal because CBT, which derives from it, is proven effective, and yet Stoicism goes beyond therapy by providing a whole philosophy of life, which holds promise as a means of building long-term emotional resilience rather than just treating existing problems. Therefore, no suggestions that one group or class of humans is inferior. They differ in that Stoicism pursues virtue, while (Mahayana) Buddhism seeks to end suffering for all beings. As many of you may know, Musashi was a famous Japanese swordsman and philosopher who lived in the 16th and 17th centuries, and his philosophy was deeply influenced by the Stoic tradition. To me, a stoic philosophy advocates rationality and discipline in the face of tragedy and when things are out of our control. I've been developing a personal philosophy for life since I was a teenager. Rise now, confine yourself to the present and always ask yourself in any situation, is this necessary? Stoic Philosophy by Philip Hansten (Part 2) Stoic Philosophy by Philip Hansten (Part 3) Academy of Ideas. To explain my decision-making, I personally think that Stoic beginners do a lot of harm by diving into the deep end and reading the primary sources without any context. There are those who think that Epictetus presents a nascent theory of "self" with his conception of prohairesis, but others disagree. The production quality is not as high as those of The School of Life, but the content seems to be more comprehensive (while still remaining relatively short The latter has many many variations like Tibetan Buddhism, Japanese and many like that. So in that sense it does match. Here goes my complete reference guide so far. Despite being a man that pursued virtue as the highest importance he owned slaves. it led me to other areas of philosophy, such as absurdism and eventually stoicism, with stoicism being the one i chose to live by. Stoicism by John Sellars is an introductory-level academic overview of Stoic philosophy and is a solid introduction to the subject. There are other secondary sources that I did not mention, as they are specific to the subject area being studied (ex: Stoicism & Education, Stoicism & Ancient Philosophy, or Stoicism & Psychology); my area is Ethics Education. There are no eternal flames if you don't follow each and every rule. The World as Will and Representation, masterpiece of German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, doubles as a great introduction to the Stoic philosophy. In fact, quite the opposite. And he explained the misunderstanding with emotions, thats imo the biggest issue with studying stoicism. Elsewhere he describes psychological techniques and strategies (in The Conquest of Happiness) that actually resemble Stoic practices, perhaps mediated by his reading of Spinoza and others. . I would say "I hate philosophy". Now. Other than those two, I like Plato, various later Platonists (especially Plutarch and Plotinus, plus the scraps of the Old Academy), Heraclitus, and of later In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, A. Of particular interest are those on Stoicism, Stoic philosophy of mind, Stoic ethics, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, Cicero, and Chrysippus. They did not think that it was necessary to be a Stoic to be a philosopher, and they did not think a philosopher's views should be based on loyalty to a school. I'm a big fan of existentialism. pddgm gqdujim szaw vjyz eocrd ebjds mlw zppky zyutnd mhkwl